Articles
Selected Articles
Archives by Topic
Archives by Month
Original 2004 Archives
Features
Resources
About Us
Search
Newsletter Signup
Enter your email address to receive the In Perrspective newsletter:
Resource Center
  • Presidential Polls
  • Other Polls
  • Document Library
  • U.S. News
  • Int'l News
  • Online & Print Mags
  • Columns/Blogs
  • Elections & Voting
  • Key Data Sources
  • Think Tanks
  • Reading List
  • Oregon Resources
  • Support the Troops
  • Columns and Blogs
  • Eric Alterman
  • AmericaBlog
  • Atrios
  • Bad Reporter
  • BlueOregon
  • Carpetbagger
  • Complete Bushisms
  • Joe Conason
  • CJR Campaign Desk
  • Crooked Timber
  • Crooks and Liars
  • Daily Kos
  • The Decembrist
  • Brad Delong
  • E.J. Dionne
  • Donkey Rising
  • Kevin Drum
  • FireDogLake
  • The Gadflyer
  • Glenn Greenwald
  • Huffington Post
  • Hullabaloo
  • Kicking Ass
  • MaxSpeak
  • Media Matters
  • Mark Kleiman
  • Paul Krugman
  • LeftyBlogs
  • MyDD
  • NDN Blog
  • New Donkey
  • Pam's House Blend
  • The Plank (TNR)
  • Political Animal
  • Political Humor
  • The Politico
  • Pollster.com
  • Satirical Political
  • Sideshow
  • Talk2Action
  • Talking Points Memo
  • TPM Cafe
  • TPM Muckraker
  • TAPPED
  • Think Progress
  • TRB
  • Wonkette
  • Matthew Yglesias
  • -- more --
  •  
    Articles
    Are We More Secure Now Than Four Years Ago?
     
    March 18, 2004

    As we mark the one-year anniversary of the U.S. invasion of Iraq, George W. Bush has made national security the foundation of his reelection effort. To no one’s surprise, the self-proclaimed “war president” is running on a theme of “steady leadership for changing times.” Given the traditional advantage the GOP has enjoyed with voters on defense and national security issues, the formula for electoral success seems straightforward: “President Bush made America safer.”

    Except that it’s not true.

    John Kerry and the Democrats can ask the American people a simple question: are you more secure now than four years ago? As with the economy, the answer won’t be welcome news to President Bush.

    Security and Myopia

    This is not to say that the Bush administration is completely unjustified in making claims of progress in the war on terror and enhancing American security. In Afghanistan, the Taliban regime was quickly toppled, and its remnants sent fleeing to the mountains bordering Pakistan. While Osama Bin Laden, Ayman Al-Zawahiri and Mullah Omar remain at large, Al Qaeda’s leadership ranks have been damaged and disrupted, with up to two-thirds of key personnel killed or captured. The current Iraqi quagmire aside, Saddam Hussein’s regime has been overthrown, and the brutal dictator captured. In Libya, the Qaddafi regime has sought renewed relations with the West, abandoning its nuclear program and acknowledging culpability for the Pan Am Lockerbie bombing. (This sea change, however, is apparently due more to months of joint American/British diplomacy, rather than the deterrent effect of the Iraq invasion.) And at home, the creation of the Department of Homeland Security and heightened preparation by state and local first responders mean, at least on paper, that the nation is better prepared to prevent or respond to domestic terrorist threats.

    There is, however, a powerful and persuasive case to be made that the United States is now more vulnerable to attack at home and abroad under President Bush’s guidance. Bush’s wartime leadership has left America’s military overstretched, its network of alliances weakened, its credibility diminished, its international appeal in tatters and homeland defense in chaos. While the U.S. is bogged down in Iraq and an undersized American force hunts for Bin Laden, the Madrid bombings show Al Qaeda is still capable of delivering lethal blows. And all the while, festering threats and conflicts in Israel, North Korea, Taiwan, remain on a short fuse.

    Skip Ahead
    1. Security and Myopia
    2. Insecurity Begins at Home
    3. Not Fighting the Good Fight
    4. Losing the Battle for Hearts and Minds
     
    Today's Mantra

    "As for that VP talk all the time, I’ll tell you, I still can’t answer that question until somebody answers for me what is it exactly that the VP does every day?"

    Gov. Sarah Palin, August 1, 2008.

     
    Church and State to Merge
    While Republican woes in Congress continue to mount with Stevens indictment, McCain campaign's wave of smears and attack ads erase Barack Obama's July lead in White House race. Threat level raised from Yellow/Elevated (Bill of Rights at Risk).
     
    The Avenging Angel

    Ted Stevens,  the octogenarian Alaska Senator and earmark king, now finds his political career in jeopardy.

    Stevens was indicted on charges of making false statements regarding $250,000 in gifts he received from the oil services company, Veco.

    With his reelection - and freedom - now in doubt, the Angel grins, Stevens may soon have the time to learn that the Internet is not a "series of tubes."

     
     

    Copyright © 2004 - 2008 PERRspectives.com. All Rights Reserved.
    Visit the Contact page to report problems with the site.