|
Are We More Secure Now Than Four Years Ago?
March 18, 2004
Insecurity Begins at Home |
Homeland Security Chaos.
American insecurity begins at home. To say that the Department
of Homeland Security, originally opposed by President Bush, has
gotten off to a slow start would be kind. As Michael Crowley
reported in depth in
The New Republic, DHS is struggling with its transition,
its technology, and even its mandate.
First, there is “charter conflict” over the central role in
coordinating and sharing intelligence data across the panoply of
federal, state and local agencies responsible for homeland
defense. Analysts at DHS’ directorate of Information Analysis
and Infrastructure Protection (IAIP) were to be on point to
synthesize and analyze intelligence from the CIA, FBI and other
sources. Inexplicably, President Bush created the
quasi-independent Terrorist Threat Integration Center (TTIC),
which reports directly to CIA head George Tenet and is housed in
CIA headquarters in Langley, Virginia. The TTIC, and not DHS, is
to be the clearinghouse of anti-terror intelligence. The result,
as the
Markle Foundation report overseen by former Netscape CEO Jim
Barksdale and former Aetna executive Zoe Baird described, is
that “TTIC's creation has caused confusion among state and local
entities, and within the federal government itself, about the
respective roles of the TTIC and DHS.”
The challenge over the department’s mission is exacerbated
weak leadership, understaffing, and interagency squabbling over
the transition process. As Crowley reports, 15 people turned
down the opportunity to run IAIP, seeing the impact roles
instead at FBI, CIA and other agencies. The former head of IAIP,
Paul Redmond, testified to Congress last June that he had filled
only one-quarter of his analyst slots, “because we do not have
the [office] space for them.” The new Border and Transportation
Security agency (BTS), combining the Customs Service and
Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS), has been slowed by
the integration of processes, computers systems, and even
weapons.
DHS hasn’t even been able to get the basics right. The
coordination of a single, computerized terrorist watch list,
seen as a key lesson of the 9/11 disaster, is months behind
schedule and nowhere near the 6-12 estimate of the independent
Markle task force. Last April, DHS Secretary Tom Ridge told a
Senate committee that the database integration was proceeding
smoothly, “I think we're fairly close to finalizing the
consolidation itself.” Almost a year later, the lists are still
not merged, and the task has been transferred from DHS to the
FBI.
Given the central role of DHS in protecting Americans here at
home,
Crowley’s conclusion seems quite justified:
No one says merging 170,000 employees from 22 different
agencies should have been easy. But, even allowing for
inevitable transition problems, DHS has been a disaster:
underfunded, undermanned, disorganized, and unforgivably
slow-moving.
The Progressive Policy Institute concurred, giving President
Bush a “D” in its detailed assessment last year,
America at Risk: A Homeland Security Report Card.
Budget Cuts for First Responders.
President Bush has spoken with pride about the progress of DHS
and his commitment to enhanced preparedness at the state and
local level.
If only it were true. President Bush’s
FY 2005 budget trims substantial sums of money from
terrorism first responders, crippling state and local
governments already swimming in red ink. While the
overall DHS budget grew roughly 10% to $40.2 billion, the
Homeland Security grant program to states and municipalities was
incomprehensibly slashed by $1 billion to only $700 million.
Funds for SafeComm, a project to provide interoperable
communication systems for first responders, were also gutted.
Over $100 million in bioterrorism funds were also cut. It’s no
wonder that even
Republican Susan Collins, the Senate Governmental affairs
committee chairwoman, called the DHS cuts “shortsighted” and
regrettable.
At the state and local level, the response has been negative
and loud. New Jersey Governor Jim McGreevey
sent a letter on February 27th to President Bush
highlighting the decisive impact of the cuts. The
United States Conference of Mayors added to the alarm,
noting that funds the administration had promised for 2003 had
not been delivered to 90% of 168 cities it surveyed in January
2004. Even
firefighters, whose images the Bush/Cheney campaign tried to
co-opt for its television ads, are big losers in the new DHS
budget.
Skip Ahead
- Security and Myopia
- Insecurity Begins at Home
- Not Fighting the Good Fight
- Losing the Battle for Hearts
and Minds
|