Articles
Features
Resources
About Us
 
Search
Newsletter Signup
Enter your email address to receive the In Perrspective newsletter:
Resource Center
  • Presidential Polls
  • Other Polls
  • Document Library
  • U.S. News
  • Int'l News
  • Online & Print Mags
  • Columns/Blogs
  • Elections & Voting
  • Key Data Sources
  • Think Tanks
  • Reading List
  • Oregon Resources
  • Support the Troops
  • Columns and Blogs
  • Eric Alterman
  • AmericaBlog
  • Atrios
  • Bad Reporter
  • BlueOregon
  • Carpetbagger
  • Complete Bushisms
  • Joe Conason
  • CJR Campaign Desk
  • Crooked Timber
  • Crooks and Liars
  • Daily Kos
  • The Decembrist
  • Brad Delong
  • E.J. Dionne
  • Donkey Rising
  • FireDogLake
  • The Gadflyer
  • Glenn Greenwald
  • Huffington Post
  • Hullabaloo
  • Kicking Ass
  • MaxSpeak
  • Media Matters
  • Mark Kleiman
  • Paul Krugman
  • LeftyBlogs
  • MyDD
  • NDN Blog
  • New Donkey
  • Pam's House Blend
  • The Plank (TNR)
  • Political Animal
  • Political Humor
  • The Politico
  • Pollster.com
  • Satirical Political
  • Sideshow
  • Talk2Action
  • Talking Points Memo
  • TPM Cafe
  • TPM Muckraker
  • TAPPED
  • Think Progress
  • TRB
  • Wonkette
  • Matthew Yglesias
  • -- more --
  •  
    March 23, 2005
    Achilles' Heels

    The political clash over the tragedy of Terri Schiavo is highlighting once again the Achilles Heel of the conservative movement. Dormant for two presidential elections, the yawning chasm between economic and social conservatives is reemerging, and with it, a serious threat to the Republicans' majority status.

    As we've noted before, the ascendancy of the Right is constantly threatened by the strains between social conservatives and their fiscally conservative, often libertarian allies. On one side, the religious Right of Robertson, Falwell, Dobson and Bauer sees a culture at risk. On the other, the laissez faire free marketeers want markets and personal liberties unfettered by the heavy hand of the government. Unfortunately for them, they can't have it both ways.

    As Atrios has conveniently summarized, the Schiavo affair and the dangerously unprecedented intervention by President Bush and the Congressional leadership has brought this schism back into the open. Stephen Moore, a free market purist now of the Free Enterprise Fund, worried that "I don't normally like to see the federal government intervening in a situation like this," adding "a lot of conservatives are really struggling with this case." Senator John Warner (R-VA) stated that he "learned from many years you've got to separate your own emotions from the duty to support the Constitution of this country." Representative Christopher Shays (R-CT), complained, "My party is demonstrating that they are for states' rights unless they don't like what states are doing." Of the Republicans' hyprocrisy and confusion over the Schiavo tragedy, Clinton inquisitor Bob Barr may have said it best:

    "To simply say that the 'culture of life,' or whatever you call it means that we don't have to pay attention to the principles of federalism or separation of powers is certainly not a conservative viewpoint."

    These tensions are always bubbling just below the surface for the conservative coalition. In 1992, Pat Buchanan's fiery primetime address to the Republican National Convention, calling on the nation to retake the culture "block by block" helped put Bill Clinton in White House. George W. Bush, mindful of the fate of his father, worked with the religious right in 2000 and again in 2004 to mute their wishes until after his election. (The "rainbow" entertainment on stage and speeches by Schwarzeneggar and Guiliani showed the lesson of pre-election moderation is one the President learned well.)

    Despite these efforts to paper over these fundamental tensions, the cracks in the conservative monolith reappear all the same. As we wrote last fall ("Markets, Morality and Monday Night Football"), the conservative factions battled again over the raunchy Terrell Owens "Desperate Housewives" ad. The economic conservatives' pure market theory stated that angry viewers-cum-consumers could express different preferences by changing the channel and watching something else. For social conservatives, there are two three-letter answers: FCC and GOD. The former could censor or otherwise regulate content to change programming; the latter could change Americans' hearts.

    Now, the Schiavo affair and the opportunism of Bill Frist and Tom Delay exposes this civil war on the Right. With their unpopular position widely seen as bankrupt and unprincipled, the mouthpieces of the conservative ascendancy are reduced to doing what they do best: attack. As the legal options fade, the Wall Street Journal, Tom Delay and their ilk slander Michael Schiavo, seeking to cast doubt on his worthiness as a means of shielding their own perfidy.

    As for the Democrats, the Republicans' potential for undoing is not necessarily their opportunity. To return from the wilderness, they must address some Achilles' Heels of their. As we've written on many occasions, until Democrats regain credibility on national security issues, shed their image as the party of multiculturalism and identity politics, and become at least competitive among white males, their hopes for an "emerging Democratic majority" will remain just that - hopes.

    For now, though, it seems that the Republicans will be punished for their role in the Schiavo affair. The longer the GOP leadership perpetuates this travesty, the longer the conservative movement will twist in the wind.

    Perrspective 12:55 PM Permalink
    Comments

    I haven't met a person who agrees with Bush/Delay/Frist on this matter, however, they'll vote Republican anyway. People just ignore facts and always beleive them...

    Posted by jay at March 23, 2005 10:30 PM

    Amen, most Americans will never know the truth because the controled media will see to that.

    Posted by Kelly McGinley at March 24, 2005 08:58 AM

    Amen, most Americans will never know the truth because the controled media will see to that.

    Posted by Kelly McGinley at March 24, 2005 08:58 AM

    Amen, most Americans will never know the truth because the controled media will see to that.

    That's the REAL story here.
    Maybe 30% of our nation wants to intervene in the Schaivo case. That would be closer to 10% if the facts were made clearly available. Probably even closer to 1%, if it were TRULY a matter of saving her life, rather than using government as a club with which to bash liberals.

    Such a huge chunk of our population is so easily swayed by our grossly biased media. Even "Clinton Network News" is obviously trying very hard to skew this story (see mediamatters.org, and the graph they used to try to make a 7% split look like a 90% split).

    This media bias is a disaster of epic proportions, the ramifications of which we're only beginning to dimly grasp. If the Democrats ever regain power again, if nothing is done about the Media Consolidation issue, I believe that Western Civilization as we know it, will come to an end, if it hasn't already.

    Posted by Osama_Been_Forgotten at March 24, 2005 12:44 PM

    Re the right wing demonizing of Michael Schiavo - aren't these the guys that used to respect the sanctity of marriage? I guess not when it doesn't suit their political needs.

    Posted by Emily Norton at March 28, 2005 08:44 PM

    "Democrats regain credibility on national security issues, shed their image as the party of multiculturalism and identity politics, and become at least competitive among white males"

    Yeah, and they need to offer a competing proposal for Social Security, too. And they need to embrace faith, because everyone knows that being the party of no, or the party of "no God" blah blah blah. What drivel! I didn't know I was reading Ed Kilgore on this blog.
    White males, as a percentage of the population, are decreasing.
    The non-professional, southern white males would vote for Hitler. They support the Schiavo intervention. How exactly do you propose to convince them to vote Democratic? Abandoning all of our key positions? Running nothing but centrist, conforming white guys?
    How could a political party have a worse national security position than Republicans? They have nothing but faith-based belligerance. If we have to parrot their positions to be popular (i.e. start pointless wars that cost 1500+ lives, and 10,000+ serious injuries), what is the point of winning elections? Patronage? What a cynical Perrspective. Would you abandon African Americans in the 60s because civil rights weren't popular in the south?

    Posted by Blogsy McBlog at March 29, 2005 04:50 PM

     
    Find Entries
    Find by Category:
    Find by Keyword(s):
    Syndicate:
    Recent Entries

    John McCain's Terrible Tuesday
    July 9, 2008 - Comments (2)

    McCain Mimics Bush with Iran Jokes, Bin Laden Boasts
    July 9, 2008 - Comments (0)

    Chickenhawk Goldberg Brands Obama's National Service Plan "Slavery"
    July 8, 2008 - Comments (0)

    McCain's Immaculate Deception on the Economy
    July 7, 2008 - Comments (0)

    Bush's Future Civics Lesson: "Replenish the Ol' Coffers"
    July 6, 2008 - Comments (1)

    Jesse Helms and the Partisan Eulogies of George W. Bush
    July 4, 2008 - Comments (0)

    This Just In From Afghanistan: Bush Doctrine Still Dead.
    July 4, 2008 - Comments (0)

    CBS Shows GOP "Emergency Room" Health Care Plan in Action
    July 3, 2008 - Comments (1)

    McCain in Central America as His 1987 Assault on Nicaraguan Revealed
    July 2, 2008 - Comments (2)

    Broder, Cohen Provide Human Shields for McCain's "Trust" Campaign
    July 1, 2008 - Comments (1)

    Monthly Archives
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • Category Archives
  • 9/11
  • Barking Mad
  • Bush Admin.
  • Business
  • China
  • Congress
  • Contests
  • Culture War
  • Democrats
  • Economy
  • Education
  • Election '04
  • Election '06
  • Election '08
  • Energy
  • Environment
  • Foreign Policy
  • GOP Quotes
  • Health Care
  • Image Gallery
  • Immigration
  • Iran
  • Iraq
  • John Kerry
  • Media
  • Nat'l Security
  • North Korea
  • Republicans
  • Soc. Security
  • Sports
  • Supreme Court
  • Technology
  • Terrorism
  • The States
  • Top 10 Lists
  •  
     

    Copyright © 2004 - 2008 PERRspectives.com. All Rights Reserved.
    Visit the Contact page to report problems with the site.