Articles
Features
Resources
About Us
 
Search
Newsletter Signup
Enter your email address to receive the In Perrspective newsletter:
Resource Center
  • Polls
  • U.S. News
  • Int'l News
  • Document Library
  • Online & Print Mags
  • Columns/Blogs
  • Elections & Voting
  • Key Data Sources
  • Think Tanks
  • Reading List
  • Oregon Resources
  • Support the Troops
  • Columns and Blogs
  • Eric Alterman
  • Marc Ambinder
  • AmericaBlog
  • Atrios
  • Bad Reporter
  • BlueOregon
  • Calculated Risk
  • Crooked Timber
  • Crooks and Liars
  • Daily Beast
  • Daily Kos
  • Brad Delong
  • E.J. Dionne
  • Kevin Drum
  • FiveThirtyEight
  • FireDogLake
  • Glenn Greenwald
  • Huffington Post
  • Hullabaloo
  • Mark Kleiman
  • Ezra Klein
  • Paul Krugman
  • LeftyBlogs
  • Rachel Maddow
  • Media Matters
  • Memeorandum
  • MyDD
  • Pam's House Blend
  • The Plank (TNR)
  • Political Animal
  • Political Humor
  • The Politico
  • Pollster.com
  • Satirical Political
  • Sideshow
  • Andrew Sullivan
  • Talk2Action
  • Talking Points Memo
  • TPM Cafe
  • TPM Muckraker
  • TAPPED
  • Think Progress
  • Wonkette
  • Matthew Yglesias
  • -- more --
  • February 10, 2007
    Romney Runs - Away

    On Tuesday, Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney will formally enter the race for the 2008 Republican nomination for President. But by announcing his run for the White House in Michigan, Romney is trying to run away - far, far away - from his own moderate reign in liberal Massachusetts.

    Romney, of course, is nominally from Michigan, where his father George ran American Motors prior to becoming the Governor and an unsuccessful challenger to Richard Nixon in 1968. That's not what makes Mitt Romney "the Rambler." No, Mitt Romney isn't returning to Michigan to praise his father for getting the state "moving again." Instead, Mitt hopes to shed his Boston baggage as heads into the GOP primaries so dominated by the radical right.

    Mitt's immaculate conception of geography started in the early days of his presidential campaign. Addressing a GOP audience in the early primary state of South Carolina, Romney in September 2005 attacked his own state:

    "Being a conservative Republican in Massachusetts is a bit like being a cattle rancher at a vegetarian convention...There are more Republicans in this room tonight than I have in my state!"

    As Perrspectives has detailed before, Romney's problems with uber right Republican primary voters began during his failed 1994 run for the Senate against Ted Kennedy and continued with his successful 2002 gubernatorial bid. Hoping to appease progressive voters in Massachusetts wary of his pro-life Mormon past, Romney flip-flopped on abortion, declaring "I believe women should have the right to make their own choice." Romney successfully defused the issue in his 2002 race against Democrat Shannon O'Brien by promising to avoid changing the status quo in the Commonwealth:

    "I promised that if elected, I'd call a truce - a moratorium, if you will...I vowed to veto any legislation that sought to change the existing rules...I fully respect and will fully protect a woman's right to choose."

    It's no wonder that in 2005, Romney advisor Michael Murphy said of Mitt that "he's been a pro-life Mormon faking it as a pro-choice friendly."

    Those gymnastics on reproductive rights may have worked with Route 128 voters in 2002, but offer a recipe for disaster with the Christian Coalition's so-called "values-voters" in the 2008 GOP primaries. Predictably, Romney began his sharp right turn. By the fall of 2005, Romney flip-flopped again on abortion, claiming that his position has "evolved" and that "my political philosophy is pro-life." The feigned outrage on same-sex marriage, the performance at the 2004 Republican National Convention, and the indignant (and overridden) veto of the Massachusetts stem cell research bill show a man quickly running back to the right in Iowa, New Hampshire and South Carolina, not Boston.

    So a Bay State backdrop as an announcement venue was clearly out of the question for the ever-calculating Romney. But there was another alternative: Mitt's previous home state of Utah.

    Romney, after all, was credited with being the savior of the 2002 Salt Lake Winter Olympics. Between 1999 and 2001, Mitt listed his $3.8 million Park City, Utah home as his primary residence. (That hiccup almost disqualified Mitt from seeking the Massachusetts Governor's mansion in 2002. Quickly paying back the $54,000 Utah tax break he had received helped salvage his political aspirations in 2002 - and 2008.) A Salt Lake city setting for the launch of Romney '08 would have been perfectly fitting.

    Except, of course, that Utah presents another set of problems for Romney. A Utah announcement would have highlighted Romney's Mormonism, potentially a major stumbling block for both Mitt's primary and general election prospects. A November 2006 Rasmussen survey showed that 43% of American voters "would never" vote for a Mormon. That figure jumps to 53% for evangelical voters. (For more on the debate over Mormonism in the White House, see the New Republic's January 15 and January 29, 2007 issues.)

    All of which brings us to Mitt Romney's campaign kick-off this week in Michigan. On Tuesday, Americans will be introduced to Romney as the Zelig of election '08, a human chameleon whose positions change with the latitude, longitude and time zone. Think of his campaign as "Where in the World is Mitt Romney?"

    Too bad being President of the United States isn't a game.

    Perrspective 4:23 PM | Permalink | Comments (4) | Share

    4 Comments

    What an unbelievable f**ing opportunist!

    Romney will probably go around saying the good things he did for Mass. Check it out, he spent more time running for pres. than runniing Mass.
    The same as the last few Repub governors in Mass., looking over their shoulder for the next opportunity

    So true Jon! I had minimal expectations of him as a governor, and he didn't even meet those. Even his own party wasn't inspired by him - remember how he made that big effort to supposedly get more Republicans elected in 2004... and Republicans actually lost seats? By running around dissing Massachusetts in other states he shows he would be as much a "president for all Americans" as the guy who's in there now. His hair may be more Reaganesque now (did you read that? He's now gelling it) but his attitude sure ain't. And to read that in his nomination speech he says "It is time for innovation and transformation in Washington". Well that is certainly true but his record does not paint him as the man to do it. He should go back to something he's good at - buying companies, laying off all the workers, and pocketing a lot of dough.

    To Multiple Choice Mitt, everything's a game - politics, the livelihoods of the folks his "venture capital" company's decisions affect, the lives of people who would be helped by medical procedures he (now) opposes for the sake of pandering to the wingnuts who hate Mormons' guts.

    Mittster is like one of those sets in a Western. All carefully groomed facade, with absolutely nothing behind it. He wants to be President because the ladder of his ambition will be satisfied with nothing else.

    Post a comment


    Find Entries
    Find by Keyword(s):
    Syndicate:
    Recent Entries

    Not Good and Pawlenty
    February 13, 2010
    Comments (1)

    Republicans Trying to Kill Medicare. Again.
    February 12, 2010
    Comments (4)

    Broder's Palin Worship Revives Stupid Candidate Theory
    February 11, 2010
    Comments (1)

    White House Press Corps Slams Gibbs' Palin Joke
    February 10, 2010
    Comments (2)

    Thiessen Laments Dead Terrorists Can't Be Tortured
    February 9, 2010
    Comments (2)

    For Republicans, No Means No
    February 8, 2010
    Comments (1)

    Republican Sexism Meets Palin's Sex Appeal
    February 8, 2010
    Comments (3)

    Palin's America Dependent on Divine Intervention
    February 8, 2010
    Comments (1)

    CBS Super Bowl Ads We'd Like to See
    February 7, 2010
    Comments (3)

    The Immaculate Convention
    February 6, 2010
    Comments (1)

    Monthly Archives
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • Category Archives
  • 9/11
  • Barking Mad
  • Bush Admin.
  • Business
  • China
  • Congress
  • Contests
  • Culture War
  • Democrats
  • Economy
  • Education
  • Election '04
  • Election '06
  • Election '08
  • Energy
  • Environment
  • Foreign Policy
  • GOP Quotes
  • Health Care
  • Image Gallery
  • Immigration
  • Iran
  • Iraq
  • John Kerry
  • Media
  • Nat'l Security
  • North Korea
  • Obama Admin.
  • Republicans
  • Soc. Security
  • Sports
  • Supreme Court
  • Technology
  • Terrorism
  • The States
  • Top 10 Lists
  •  

    Copyright © 2004 - 2010 PERRspectives.com. All Rights Reserved.
    Visit the Contact page to report problems with the site.