In his Wisconsin victory speech this evening, John McCain wasted no time in firing shots across Barack Obama's bow. Hoping to highlight the Democratic frontrunner's inexperience, McCain to partisan cheers ridiculed Obama's promises as "eloquent but empty." But in a preview of Republican duplicity to come, McCain blasted Obama's past advocacy of unilateral American attacks against Al Qaeda targets in Pakistan, attacks the Bush administration itself is now finally carrying out.

In August, as you'll recall, Barack received a hellstorm of criticism for his statements regarding attacking Al Qaeda bases in Pakistan. As part of broad - and forceful - foreign policy speech on August 1, Obama rightly took the Bush administration to task for the failure of its "no safe havens" doctrine in Pakistan. Regarding the Al Qaeda sanctuary safely nestled along the Afghan border, Obama declared, "If we have actionable intelligence about high-value terrorist targets and President Musharraf won't act, we will."

The White House and some of his Democratic rivals were quick to condemn Obama's comments. Despite the renewed Al Qaeda threat documented in a recent National Intelligence Estimate, then Bush press secretary Tony Snow rejected unilateral American strikes inside Pakistan without the blessing of President Pervez Musharraf:

"We think that our approach to Pakistan is not only one that respects the sovereignty of Pakistan, but also is designed so that we are working in cooperation."

As it turns out, not so much. At least, not any more.

On the very day John McCain assailed Barack Obama, the Washington Post detailed that the U.S. is now carrying out covert strikes within Pakistan without prior authorization from the Musharraf government. In an article titled, "Unilateral Strike Called a Model for U.S. Operations in Pakistan," the Post described the January 29 Predator drone attack that killed Al Qaeda leader Abu Laith Al-Libi:

The missiles killed Abu Laith al-Libi, a senior al-Qaeda commander and a man who had repeatedly eluded the CIA's dragnet. It was the first successful strike against al-Qaeda's core leadership in two years, and it involved, U.S. officials say, an unusual degree of autonomy by the CIA inside Pakistan.

Having requested the Pakistani government's official permission for such strikes on previous occasions, only to be put off or turned down, this time the U.S. spy agency did not seek approval. The government of Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf was notified only as the operation was underway, according to the officials, who insisted on anonymity because of diplomatic sensitivities.

As the Post also detailed, this long overdue shift represents the Bush administration's grudging acceptance of the reality on the ground across the border from Afghanistan. The recommended approach of the Pentagon, as well as Barack Obama, is becoming the policy of President Bush:

Top Bush administration policy officials - who are increasingly worried about al-Qaeda's use of its sanctuary in remote, tribally ruled areas in northern Pakistan to dispatch trained terrorists to the West - have quietly begun to accept the military's point of view, according to several sources familiar with the context of the Libi strike.

But you won't hear that from John McCain. The presumptive Republican nominee will play the inexperience card against Barack Obama. And McCain's deceptive attacks will include criticizing Barack Obama for a strategy that is now the policy of the current occupant of the Oval Office.

UPDATE: CNN re-aired a 2006 interview in which President Bush told Wolf Blizter he would "absolutely" give the order to kill or capture Al Qaeda leaders in Pakistan, even if the government in Islamabad objected. That, of course, didn't stop Bush from telling Fox News just 10 days ago that Obama is "going to attack Pakistan." Meanwhile, the major media remains silent on John McCain's Beach Boys parody, "Bomb Bomb Iran."