Articles
Features
Resources
About Us
 
Search
Newsletter Signup
Enter your email address to receive the In Perrspective newsletter:
Resource Center
  • Presidential Polls
  • Other Polls
  • Document Library
  • U.S. News
  • Int'l News
  • Online & Print Mags
  • Columns/Blogs
  • Elections & Voting
  • Key Data Sources
  • Think Tanks
  • Reading List
  • Oregon Resources
  • Support the Troops
  • Columns and Blogs
  • Eric Alterman
  • Marc Ambinder
  • AmericaBlog
  • Atrios
  • Bad Reporter
  • BlueOregon
  • Carpetbagger
  • Complete Bushisms
  • CJR Campaign Desk
  • Crooked Timber
  • Crooks and Liars
  • Daily Beast
  • Daily Kos
  • Brad Delong
  • E.J. Dionne
  • Kevin Drum
  • FiveThirtyEight
  • FireDogLake
  • Glenn Greenwald
  • Huffington Post
  • Hullabaloo
  • Media Matters
  • Mark Kleiman
  • Paul Krugman
  • LeftyBlogs
  • Memeorandum
  • MyDD
  • Pam's House Blend
  • The Plank (TNR)
  • Political Animal
  • Political Humor
  • The Politico
  • Pollster.com
  • Satirical Political
  • Sideshow
  • Andrew Sullivan
  • Talk2Action
  • Talking Points Memo
  • TPM Cafe
  • TPM Muckraker
  • TAPPED
  • Think Progress
  • Wonkette
  • Matthew Yglesias
  • -- more --
  •  
    September 17, 2008
    McCain Excluded Workers from "Economic Fundamentals" - Until Now

    On Wednesday, the New York Times blasted John McCain's cynical attempt to escape from his repeated proclamations that "the fundamentals of our economy are strong." Facing a backlash over his latest declaration even as Wall Street imploded Monday that all is well, McCain just hours later tried to redefine "economic fundamentals" to refer to American workers. Noting that the "Mr. McCain lavished praise on workers, but ignored their problems," the Times branded McCain's double-talk "the real insult."

    But even more insulting, of course, is that John McCain knows all too well that "economic fundamentals" means something else. It's not just that McCain has used the expression at least 18 times over the course of the campaign. Back in April, he told us how he defined the term, and to be sure, the American worker was no part of it.

    On April 17th, Senator McCain was interviewed on Bloomberg TV by Peter Cook. Cook posed Ronald Reagan's Carter-killing question to McCain. John McCain proudly declared not only "that there's been great progress economically" during the Bush presidency, but that "the fundamentals of America's economy are strong":

    MR. COOK: I'm going to ask you a version of the Ronald Reagan question. You think if Americans were asked, are you better off today than you were before George Bush took office more than seven years ago, what answer would they give?

    SEN. MCCAIN: [...] I think if you look at the overall record and millions of jobs have been created, et cetera, et cetera, you could make an argument that there's been great progress economically over that period of time. But that's no comfort. That's no comfort to families now that are facing these tremendous economic challenges.

    But let me just add, Peter, the fundamentals of America's economy are strong. We're the greatest exporter, the greatest importer, the greatest innovator, the greatest producer, still the greatest economic engine in the world. And, by the way, exports and free trade are a key element in economic recovery.

    As with his feeble attempt Monday to disown his Hoover-era rhetoric, McCain literally the next day on April 18th flip-flopped on the Bush economy. Again appearing on Bloomberg TV, this time with host Al Hunt, McCain backtracked and acknowledged, "Americans are not better off than they were eight years ago."

    Fast forward to this week's Wall Street meltdown and John McCain is in full retreat from his "fundamentals are strong" comment. His semantic scheme isn't merely to question what the meaning of "is" is. This time, he's using American workers as a human shield:

    "My opponents may disagree, but those fundamentals of America are strong...Our workers have always been the strength of our economy, and they remain the strength of our economy today."

    Sadly, the saga over "fundamentals" is just the latest installment of John McCain's long-running tale of duplicity when it comes to the economy. Back in June, McCain ridiculed economists for their overwhelming dismissal of his proposed gas-tax holiday scheme:

    "You know the economists?'' McCain said June 12 at Federal Hall, near the New York Stock Exchange. "They're the same ones that didn't predict this housing crisis we're in. They're the same ones that didn't predict the dot-com meltdown. They're the same ones that didn't predict the inflation that's staring us in the face today."

    Three weeks later, McCain had a change of heart towards their profession, announcing that 300 economists had "enthusiastically endorsed" his so-called "Jobs for America" plan. But as the Politico noted at the time, that too was a fraud:

    There's just one problem. Upon closer inspection, it seems a good many of those economists don't actually support the whole of McCain's economic agenda. And at least one doesn't even support McCain for president.

    This morning, the New York Times rightly concluded of McCain's rapid redefinition of economic fundamentals, "The clarification was far more worrisome than his initial comments." After all, this pathetic chapter is just the latest confirmation that John McCain's understanding of the fundamentals of the American economy is weak.

    Perrspective 09:50 AM Permalink
    Comments

    Post a comment



     
    Find Entries
    Find by Category:
    Find by Keyword(s):
    Syndicate:
    Recent Entries

    Snub of Spain Just McCain's Latest Europe Bashing
    September 18, 2008 - Comments (0)

    McCain Excluded Workers from "Economic Fundamentals" - Until Now
    September 17, 2008 - Comments (0)

    History Lesson: Wall Street, Economy Do Better Under Democrats
    September 16, 2008 - Comments (2)

    Candidate McCain Violates U.S. Naval Academy Honor Code
    September 15, 2008 - Comments (3)

    McCain Camp Admits Issues, Truth Don't Matter
    September 15, 2008 - Comments (0)

    McCain Lies About Palin's Expertise on Energy
    September 14, 2008 - Comments (1)

    ABC's Gibson, The View Ignore Ultra Hard-Line GOP Platform
    September 13, 2008 - Comments (0)

    The Bush Doctrine for Dummies, Sarah Palin Edition
    September 11, 2008 - Comments (2)

    9/11 and Bush's Law of Bin Laden
    September 11, 2008 - Comments (1)

    eBay McCain's Answer for Recession and Palin's Plane
    September 10, 2008 - Comments (0)

    Monthly Archives
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • Category Archives
  • 9/11
  • Barking Mad
  • Bush Admin.
  • Business
  • China
  • Congress
  • Contests
  • Culture War
  • Democrats
  • Economy
  • Education
  • Election '04
  • Election '06
  • Election '08
  • Energy
  • Environment
  • Foreign Policy
  • GOP Quotes
  • Health Care
  • Image Gallery
  • Immigration
  • Iran
  • Iraq
  • John Kerry
  • Media
  • Nat'l Security
  • North Korea
  • Republicans
  • Soc. Security
  • Sports
  • Supreme Court
  • Technology
  • Terrorism
  • The States
  • Top 10 Lists
  •  
     

    Copyright © 2004 - 2008 PERRspectives.com. All Rights Reserved.
    Visit the Contact page to report problems with the site.