Articles
Features
Resources
About Us
 
Search
Newsletter Signup
Enter your email address to receive the In Perrspective newsletter:
Resource Center
  • Polls
  • U.S. News
  • Int'l News
  • Document Library
  • Online & Print Mags
  • Columns/Blogs
  • Elections & Voting
  • Key Data Sources
  • Think Tanks
  • Reading List
  • Oregon Resources
  • Support the Troops
  • Columns and Blogs
  • Eric Alterman
  • Marc Ambinder
  • AmericaBlog
  • Atrios
  • Bad Reporter
  • BlueOregon
  • Calculated Risk
  • Crooked Timber
  • Crooks and Liars
  • Daily Beast
  • Daily Kos
  • Brad Delong
  • E.J. Dionne
  • Kevin Drum
  • FiveThirtyEight
  • FireDogLake
  • Glenn Greenwald
  • Huffington Post
  • Hullabaloo
  • Mark Kleiman
  • Ezra Klein
  • Paul Krugman
  • LeftyBlogs
  • Rachel Maddow
  • Media Matters
  • Memeorandum
  • MyDD
  • Pam's House Blend
  • The Plank (TNR)
  • Political Animal
  • Political Humor
  • The Politico
  • Pollster.com
  • Satirical Political
  • Sideshow
  • Andrew Sullivan
  • Talk2Action
  • Talking Points Memo
  • TPM Cafe
  • TPM Muckraker
  • TAPPED
  • Think Progress
  • Wonkette
  • Matthew Yglesias
  • -- more --
  • January 30, 2009
    Republicans Brand Ronald Reagan Socialist Welfare King

    Among the most predictable frauds in the Republican war against the Obama stimulus plan is the bogus claim that it offers to tax credits to Americans "not paying taxes." But while voters on Election Day rejected the cries of "socialism" from John McCain and Sarah Palin, GOP leaders from Rudy Giuliani and John Kyl to Jim Demint continue to deride Obama's proposed tax credits for working Americans as "welfare."

    As it turns out, that puts them on the opposite side from conservative patron saint Ronald Reagan. As his latter-day adherents conveniently forget, it was Reagan who famously proclaimed the bipartisan Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) "the best anti-poverty, the best pro-family, the best job creation measure to come out of Congress."

    Former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani provides a case in point. One week before taking to the airwaves to defend the $18 billion in taxpayer subsidized bonuses to Wall Street executives that President Obama deemed "shameful," Giuliani told Fox News' Sean Hannity that the Obama economic recovery package constituted welfare:

    HANNITY: All right. The -- and other big issue that is facing this country right now is the economy. He's talking about trillion-dollar deficits as far as we can see. He's saying it's a tax cut, but people who don't pay taxes are going to get a check.

    Look, you dealt with welfare in New York. Is that welfare?

    GIULIANI: Yes, if -- somebody is not paying taxes is going to get a check from the government, then that is welfare. You haven't earned it, that's a welfare payment. I think he's going to have to abandon that in light of the economic situation.

    In reliably regurgitating the Republican talking point (that Barack Obama wants to give tax cuts as welfare to the undeserving) promulgated by the Wall Street Journal, the Washington Times, Townhall and other mouthpieces of the right during the 2008 campaign, Giuliani like John McCain before him is ignoring two inconvenient truths.

    First, as Salon, the Washington Monthly and the New Republic among others quickly pointed out last fall, the Republican braintrust is willfully sidestepping the fact that essentially all working Americans pay Social Security and Medicare payroll taxes starting with very first dollar they earn. Importantly, as the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center concluded in a 2003 analysis, "three quarters of filers pay more in payroll taxes than in income taxes." And as Robert Gordon and James Kvaal noted at the New Republic:

    "It is true that Obama has proposed several tax credits that include families who earn too little to owe income taxes, a group that include about half of families with children. But many of these families work and pay thousands of dollars in other taxes. For example, a family of four must earn about $25,000 before owing income taxes--but they must pay payroll taxes on the first dollar they earn. Indeed, Obama's biggest refundable credit ['Making Work Pay'] is designed to cushion the blow of payroll taxes."

    It is with good reason that Salon deemed the shared critique of the Congressional GOP and its allies at the Wall Street Journal, "economic illiteracy."

    Which brings us to the second part of the Republicans' fraudulent charge. That millions of hard working American families pay no income taxes is due in large measure to the Earned Income Tax Credit. Created in 1975, the EITC "a refundable federal income tax credit for low-income working individuals and families" that results in a tax refund to those who claim and qualify for the credit when the EITC exceeds the amount of taxes owed. As the Center for Budget and Policy Priorities detailed in 2005, the EITC has not only been extremely successful in reducing poverty, it has enjoyed broad bipartisan support:

    The Earned Income Tax Credit has been found to produce substantial increases in employment and reductions in welfare receipt among single parents, as well as large decreases in poverty. Research indicates that families use the EITC to pay for necessities, repair homes and vehicles that are needed to commute to work, and in some cases, to help boost their employability and earning power by obtaining additional education or training.

    The EITC has enjoyed substantial bipartisan support. President Reagan, President George H. W. Bush, and President Clinton all praised it and proposed expansions in it, and economists across the political spectrum - including conservative economists Gary Becker (a Nobel laureate) and Robert Barro, among others - have lauded it.

    While Giuliani and McCain are apparently now content to side with the likes of Newt Gingrich and Phil Gramm in terming EITC recipients "lucky duckies," they sadly find themselves fighting the Gipper himself.

    While many of his conservative allies expressed disdain for the working poor, Ronald Reagan championed the refundable Earned Income Tax Credit. As the American Prospect recalled in 2006:

    Almost 20 years ago, as he signed into law the tax bill expanding the Earned Income Tax Credit, President Ronald Reagan hailed it as "the best anti-poverty, the best pro-family, the best job creation measure to come out of Congress."

    It's no wonder John McCain in 1999 called the EITC a "much-needed tax credit for working Americans."

    But that was then, and this is now. With Democrat Barack Obama in the White House, tax credits for working Americans represent, in the words of South Carolina Republicam Jim Demint, "a mugging" and a "slide towards socialism."

    As the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal detailed, it was this very issue that prompted President Obama last week to gently remind Republicans "I won." While the President patiently listened to Republicans including Mitch McConnell (R-KY), John Kyl (R-AZ), John Boehner (R-OH) and Eric Cantor (R-VA) air their grievances and alternatives at the White House, Obama was forced to smack down Kyl on the tax credit point:

    Challenged by one Republican senator over the contents of the package, the new president, according to participants, replied: "I won."

    The statement was prompted by Senate Minority Whip Jon Kyl of Arizona , who challenged the president and the Democratic leaders over the balance between the package's spending and tax cuts, bringing up the traditional Republican notion that a tax credit for people who do not earn enough to pay income taxes is not a tax cut but a government check.

    Obama noted that such workers pay Social Security and Medicare taxes, property taxes and sales taxes. The issue was widely debated during the presidential campaign, when Sen. John McCain, the Republican nominee, challenged Obama's tax plan as "welfare."

    With those two words - "I won" - the Democratic president let the Republicans know that debate has been put to rest Nov. 4.

    As for the remaining Republicans in Congress, a different debate is raging within their party as the economic recovery package unfolds. Appearing on PBS, presidential historian Richard Norton Smith said:

    "[Obama] knows the Republican Party has been reduced to a rump, ideologically and geographically, and he's going to give them a choice of being, in effect, the Rush Limbaugh Republican Party or the Ronald Reagan Republican Party."

    Apparently, Rudy Giuliani, John Kyl and their Republican colleagues have made their choice and lined up with the right-wing radio host and poster child for Oxycontin addiction. Today's Republicans aren't with Barack Obama or even Ronald Reagan, but with Rush Limbaugh.

    Perrspective 11:14 AM | Permalink | Comments (0) | Share

    No Comments

    Post a comment


    Find Entries
    Find by Keyword(s):
    Syndicate:
    Recent Entries

    What's (Still) the Matter with Oklahoma?
    September 21, 2009
    Comments (0)

    Bi-Curious Baucus
    September 20, 2009
    Comments (0)

    Teen Birth Rates Highest in Religious Red States
    September 17, 2009
    Comments (0)

    Baucus Bill Latest Proof of Krugman's Law
    September 16, 2009
    Comments (1)

    A Look Back at the Week That Doomed John McCain
    September 15, 2009
    Comments (0)

    Employers to Raise Health Care Costs, Cut Coverage
    September 15, 2009
    Comments (0)

    10 Lessons for Tea Baggers
    September 14, 2009
    Comments (3)

    The Republicans' Zombie Myth of 9/11 and Iraq
    September 11, 2009
    Comments (0)

    The Bad Medicine of the Republican Doctors
    September 10, 2009
    Comments (2)

    10 Missing Republican Talking Points on Health Care
    September 9, 2009
    Comments (2)

    Monthly Archives
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • Category Archives
  • 9/11
  • Barking Mad
  • Bush Admin.
  • Business
  • China
  • Congress
  • Contests
  • Culture War
  • Democrats
  • Economy
  • Education
  • Election '04
  • Election '06
  • Election '08
  • Energy
  • Environment
  • Foreign Policy
  • GOP Quotes
  • Health Care
  • Image Gallery
  • Immigration
  • Iran
  • Iraq
  • John Kerry
  • Media
  • Nat'l Security
  • North Korea
  • Obama Admin.
  • Republicans
  • Soc. Security
  • Sports
  • Supreme Court
  • Technology
  • Terrorism
  • The States
  • Top 10 Lists
  •  

    Copyright © 2004 - 2010 PERRspectives.com. All Rights Reserved.
    Visit the Contact page to report problems with the site.