Articles
Features
Resources
About Us
 
Search
Newsletter Signup
Enter your email address to receive the In Perrspective newsletter:
Resource Center
  • Polls
  • U.S. News
  • Int'l News
  • Document Library
  • Online & Print Mags
  • Columns/Blogs
  • Elections & Voting
  • Key Data Sources
  • Think Tanks
  • Reading List
  • Oregon Resources
  • Support the Troops
  • Columns and Blogs
  • Eric Alterman
  • Marc Ambinder
  • AmericaBlog
  • Atrios
  • Bad Reporter
  • BlueOregon
  • Calculated Risk
  • Crooked Timber
  • Crooks and Liars
  • Daily Beast
  • Daily Kos
  • Brad Delong
  • E.J. Dionne
  • Kevin Drum
  • FiveThirtyEight
  • FireDogLake
  • Glenn Greenwald
  • Huffington Post
  • Hullabaloo
  • Mark Kleiman
  • Ezra Klein
  • Paul Krugman
  • LeftyBlogs
  • Rachel Maddow
  • Media Matters
  • Memeorandum
  • MyDD
  • Pam's House Blend
  • The Plank (TNR)
  • Political Animal
  • Political Humor
  • The Politico
  • Pollster.com
  • Satirical Political
  • Sideshow
  • Andrew Sullivan
  • Talk2Action
  • Talking Points Memo
  • TPM Cafe
  • TPM Muckraker
  • TAPPED
  • Think Progress
  • Wonkette
  • Matthew Yglesias
  • -- more --
  • February 6, 2009
    Too Little, Too Late for Obama on Stimulus?

    After two weeks of letting his Republican opponents in Congress dominate debate over his economic stimulus package, President Obama is finally starting to fight back. Blasting the GOP for an economy "headed over a cliff," Obama only now is showing signs of playing his strong hand. But it may be too late. While Obama will likely win the battle in getting a waterered-down version of his recovery package, he may have already lost the war by resuscitating the recently moribund Republican Party from its vegetative state.

    With GOP surrogates continuing to badly outnumber Democrats on cable news and polls showing support for his stimulus plan dropping, Obama finally returned fire over the past 24 hours. Speaking at the Energy Department on Thursday, Obama thundered:

    "So let me be clear: Those ideas have been tested, and they have failed. They've taken us from surpluses to an annual deficit of over a trillion dollars, and they've brought our economy to a halt. And that's precisely what the election we just had was all about. The American people have rendered their judgment. And now is the time to move forward, not back. Now is the time for action."

    Addressing a House Democratic retreat last night, the President highlighted not just the urgent need for action on the economy, but the proven record of Republican failure on the issue. Insisting "we can't embrace the losing formula that says only tax cuts will work for every problem we face," Obama warned GOP economic prescriptions have the U.S. economy "headed for a cliff." Reminding Americans that "I found this deficit when I showed up," President Obama summed up the discredited Republican economic philosophy:

    "I welcome this debate. But come on, we're not -- we are not going to get relief by turning back to the very same policies that for the last eight years doubled the national debt and threw our economy into a tailspin."

    Friday's dismal unemployment numbers provided Obama with more ammunition for a new salvo against Republican obstructionists in the Senate. Calling their delay "inexcusable and irresponsible," Obama pointed to the skyrocketing 7.6% joblessness figure and warned:

    "All of us in Washington must remember that we're here to work for the American people. And if we drag our feet and fail to act, this crisis will turn into a catastrophe."

    By all indications, the Obama counterattack won't end there. His has apparently returned to campaign mode, and has decided to adopt the sharper tone candidate Obama featured when the economic meltdown commenced in September. In addition, on Monday Obama will hold a prime-time press conference, and may deliver a nationally-televised address early next week.

    But the damage has already been done. While Senate Majority leader Harry Reid tries to scrounge up votes, supposed Senate moderates are already gutting education, health care and other needed funding from the $900 billion package. In all likelihood, Barack Obama will sign a stimulus bill, but not the he could have - or should have - had.

    And that's in large measure because his strategy of bipartisanship for bipartisanship's sake will have backfired on him. As I've detailed before, Obama gambled that all of his outreach to Republicans would pay off in more votes on his recovery package now, or in support later from a public grateful for a new tone in Washington. Alas, he seems destined to get neither. Failing to capitalize on the enormous reservoir of good will from the American people, Obama has only served to energize a beaten and battered GOP now determined to repeat its successful 1990's obstructionism of Bill Clinton.

    It is a relief to finally see Barack Obama fight back against Republican opponents afraid not that he might fail, but that he might succeed. And while his self-defeating kowtowing to Republicans may eventually get him a bill he can sign, his appeasement has only served, as George W. Bush liked to say, to embolden the enemy.

    Perrspective 2:15 PM | Permalink | Comments (6) | Share

    6 Comments

    President Obama's idea of "bipartisan outreach" is "I won the election. Now shut up and eat your crap sandwich".

    While the Democratic congress celebrates its third year in power by handing him "the one thing that will help this economy", in other news, the President is assembling a team of "the smartest guys in the country" to come up with a plan to help the economy.

    For most people who finished the third grade, this plan would have come BEFORE all the money was blown on irrelevant foofuraw.

    this stimulus package helps the unemployed couples ? what the hell about the single divorced man who pays child support for 3 children too tow women. hell i cant even take one of the children as a dependant child support is not TAX DEDUTIBLE DAMN IT THIS COUNTRY SUCKS all women have to do is have a child then they have a paycheck for the next 18 years .

    Craig, You should have kept your willie in your pants. With regards to supporting your children, you should considered the consequences before you dropped your pants. If you're going to play, you have to pay! Dem's the rules!

    no, i believe you have to keep on going with this because the way things are going, you need to lead this great nation of ours to show the world how we can endure the life cycle of oyur lives and move on to prosparity such as no has seen before! Move on and lead the world in uniting and one and things will come together as one!!

    No, I believe you have to keep on going with this because the way things are going, you need to lead this great nation of ours to show the world how we can endure the life cycle of our lives and move on to prosparity such as no has seen before! Move on and lead the world in uniting as one and things will come together as one!! We
    will stumble, but there is a way to stand up and move on!!
    where is my error?

    This is a pretty bizarre thread...

    Post a comment


    Find Entries
    Find by Keyword(s):
    Syndicate:
    Recent Entries

    What's (Still) the Matter with Oklahoma?
    September 21, 2009
    Comments (0)

    Bi-Curious Baucus
    September 20, 2009
    Comments (0)

    Teen Birth Rates Highest in Religious Red States
    September 17, 2009
    Comments (0)

    Baucus Bill Latest Proof of Krugman's Law
    September 16, 2009
    Comments (1)

    A Look Back at the Week That Doomed John McCain
    September 15, 2009
    Comments (0)

    Employers to Raise Health Care Costs, Cut Coverage
    September 15, 2009
    Comments (0)

    10 Lessons for Tea Baggers
    September 14, 2009
    Comments (3)

    The Republicans' Zombie Myth of 9/11 and Iraq
    September 11, 2009
    Comments (0)

    The Bad Medicine of the Republican Doctors
    September 10, 2009
    Comments (2)

    10 Missing Republican Talking Points on Health Care
    September 9, 2009
    Comments (2)

    Monthly Archives
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • Category Archives
  • 9/11
  • Barking Mad
  • Bush Admin.
  • Business
  • China
  • Congress
  • Contests
  • Culture War
  • Democrats
  • Economy
  • Education
  • Election '04
  • Election '06
  • Election '08
  • Energy
  • Environment
  • Foreign Policy
  • GOP Quotes
  • Health Care
  • Image Gallery
  • Immigration
  • Iran
  • Iraq
  • John Kerry
  • Media
  • Nat'l Security
  • North Korea
  • Obama Admin.
  • Republicans
  • Soc. Security
  • Sports
  • Supreme Court
  • Technology
  • Terrorism
  • The States
  • Top 10 Lists
  •  

    Copyright © 2004 - 2010 PERRspectives.com. All Rights Reserved.
    Visit the Contact page to report problems with the site.