Articles
Features
Resources
About Us
 
Search
Newsletter Signup
Enter your email address to receive the In Perrspective newsletter:
Resource Center
  • Polls
  • U.S. News
  • Int'l News
  • Document Library
  • Online & Print Mags
  • Columns/Blogs
  • Elections & Voting
  • Key Data Sources
  • Think Tanks
  • Reading List
  • Oregon Resources
  • Support the Troops
  • Columns and Blogs
  • Eric Alterman
  • Marc Ambinder
  • AmericaBlog
  • Atrios
  • Bad Reporter
  • BlueOregon
  • Calculated Risk
  • Crooked Timber
  • Crooks and Liars
  • Daily Beast
  • Daily Kos
  • Brad Delong
  • E.J. Dionne
  • Kevin Drum
  • FiveThirtyEight
  • FireDogLake
  • Glenn Greenwald
  • Huffington Post
  • Hullabaloo
  • Mark Kleiman
  • Paul Krugman
  • LeftyBlogs
  • Media Matters
  • Memeorandum
  • MyDD
  • Pam's House Blend
  • The Plank (TNR)
  • Political Animal
  • Political Humor
  • The Politico
  • Pollster.com
  • Satirical Political
  • Sideshow
  • Andrew Sullivan
  • Talk2Action
  • Talking Points Memo
  • TPM Cafe
  • TPM Muckraker
  • TAPPED
  • Think Progress
  • Wonkette
  • Matthew Yglesias
  • -- more --
  • November 2, 2009
    Bush's Iron Law of Bin Laden Still Holds

    Like a broken clock, even George W. Bush can be right twice a day. And so it was with his pronouncement on the fate of Obama Bin Laden before a weekend conference of business leaders in New Delhi, "I guess he is not dead." But the 43rd president wasn't merely stating the obvious regarding the Al Qaeda chieftain who escaped his under-resourced effort in Afghanistan. As it turns out, Dubya even out of office is following the same playbook he used in it: the threat posed by Bin Laden is directly proportional to the threat to President Bush's political standing. Call it Bush's "Iron Law of Bin Laden."

    Bush's nonchalance this weekend reflects the simple fact that the danger posed by the 9/11 mastermind can no longer help - or hurt - him politically:

    Asked whether al-Qaida chief Osama bin Laden could be alive, Bush said "I guess he is not dead."

    He, however, noted that Laden is hiding and "not leading victory parades" or "espousing his cause" on TV.

    He expressed confidence that Laden will be brought to justice which "he deserves to be" and it was a matter of time.

    But it was a different picture indeed in the wake of revelations that President Bush had authorized illicit surveillance of Americans by the NSA. Trying to fight back the growing public outcry over his illegal domestic wiretapping program, President Bush used the Bin Laden bogeyman once again during his remarks in January 2006 at the National Security Agency. Bush lashed out at his critics:

    "All I would ask them to do is listen to the words of Osama bin Laden and take him seriously. When he says he's going to hurt the American people again, or try to, he means it. I take it seriously, and the people of NSA take it seriously."

    Bush, of course, did not take Bin Laden seriously in four years previously. Questioned about his silence regarding Bin Laden in the months following the American failure to capture the Al Qaeda chieftain in Tora Bora, Afghanistan, a nonchalant Bush on March 13, 2002 downplayed his significance:

    "So I don't know where he is. You know, I just don't spend that much time on him, Kelly, to be honest with you...I'll repeat what I said. I truly am not that concerned about him."

    Bush may have been embarrassed by his failure to capture Bin Laden in 2002, but by the fall of 2004, he faced the prospect of American voters who seemed to recall the murder of 3,000 of their countrymen. In the third presidential debate with John Kerry, a childlike Bush on October 13, 2004 tried for a "do over" of his statement two and a half years earlier:

    "Gosh, I just don't think I ever said I'm not worried about Osama bin Laden. It's kind of one of those exaggerations. Of course we're worried about Osama bin Laden."

    Which brings us full circle. In the aftermath of 9/11, President Bush used the specter of Osama Bin Laden to rally what had been a faltering presidency. In a show of frontier bravado, Bush talked tough about Bin Laden just days after the 9/11 attacks:

    "There's an old poster out west, as I recall, that said, 'Wanted: Dead or Alive.'"

    Ultimately, Bush later insisted, he came to regret "using bad language" like "dead or alive" or "bring 'em on." (That begrudging concession followed his stunning April 2004 declaration that " I'm sure something will pop into my head here...maybe I'm not as quick on my feet as I should be in coming up with one" when asked to name his biggest mistake as president.) But President Bush seems blissfully unconcerned about his failure to capture or kill Osama Bin Laden, as his latest pooh-poohing shows. After all, George W. Bush doesn't need him anymore.

    UPDATE: For older readers, Bush's recent announcement may sound like Chevy Chase's 1970's routine on Saturday Night Live, "Generalissimo Francisco Franco is still dead."

    Perrspective 10:22 AM | Permalink | Comments (0) | Share

    No Comments

    Post a comment


    Find Entries
    Find by Keyword(s):
    Syndicate:
    Recent Entries

    The Republican Virginity Pledge
    November 24, 2009
    Comments (0)

    Pray for Republicans: Luke 23:34.
    November 23, 2009
    Comments (1)

    Sarah Palin's Willing Objectifiers
    November 20, 2009
    Comments (3)

    2009 Democratic Deficit Cutters vs. 2003 GOP Budget Busters
    November 19, 2009
    Comments (0)

    Joan of Palin Leads the Republican War on Science
    November 18, 2009
    Comments (0)

    Red State Reality: Unhealthiest Residents, Worst Health Care
    November 17, 2009
    Comments (3)

    Palin Fights Huckabee for the Hand of God
    November 17, 2009
    Comments (2)

    GOP Embraces Medicare Official Bush Tried to Fire
    November 16, 2009
    Comments (0)

    Born Again Deficit Virgins
    November 15, 2009
    Comments (2)

    Hutchison and the Republican Hypocrisy on Term Limits
    November 13, 2009
    Comments (1)

    Monthly Archives
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • Category Archives
  • 9/11
  • Barking Mad
  • Bush Admin.
  • Business
  • China
  • Congress
  • Contests
  • Culture War
  • Democrats
  • Economy
  • Education
  • Election '04
  • Election '06
  • Election '08
  • Energy
  • Environment
  • Foreign Policy
  • GOP Quotes
  • Health Care
  • Image Gallery
  • Immigration
  • Iran
  • Iraq
  • John Kerry
  • Media
  • Nat'l Security
  • North Korea
  • Obama Admin.
  • Republicans
  • Soc. Security
  • Sports
  • Supreme Court
  • Technology
  • Terrorism
  • The States
  • Top 10 Lists
  •  

    Copyright © 2004 - 2009 PERRspectives.com. All Rights Reserved.
    Visit the Contact page to report problems with the site.