Articles
Features
Resources
About Us
 
Search
Newsletter Signup
Enter your email address to receive the In Perrspective newsletter:
Resource Center
  • Polls
  • U.S. News
  • Int'l News
  • Document Library
  • Online & Print Mags
  • Columns/Blogs
  • Elections & Voting
  • Key Data Sources
  • Think Tanks
  • Reading List
  • Oregon Resources
  • Support the Troops
  • Columns and Blogs
  • Eric Alterman
  • Marc Ambinder
  • AmericaBlog
  • Atrios
  • Bad Reporter
  • BlueOregon
  • Calculated Risk
  • Crooked Timber
  • Crooks and Liars
  • Daily Beast
  • Daily Kos
  • Brad Delong
  • E.J. Dionne
  • Kevin Drum
  • FiveThirtyEight
  • FireDogLake
  • Glenn Greenwald
  • Huffington Post
  • Hullabaloo
  • Mark Kleiman
  • Ezra Klein
  • Paul Krugman
  • LeftyBlogs
  • Rachel Maddow
  • Media Matters
  • Memeorandum
  • MyDD
  • Pam's House Blend
  • The Plank (TNR)
  • Political Animal
  • Political Humor
  • The Politico
  • Pollster.com
  • Satirical Political
  • Sideshow
  • Andrew Sullivan
  • Talk2Action
  • Talking Points Memo
  • TPM Cafe
  • TPM Muckraker
  • TAPPED
  • Think Progress
  • Wonkette
  • Matthew Yglesias
  • -- more --
  • December 15, 2009
    Sheep, Unicorns, Kamikazes and Joe Lieberman

    When Vermont Republican Senator Jim Jeffords balked at supporting President Bush's wildly irresponsible tax cuts in 2001, the retribution from the White House and its GOP allies in Congress was swift and severe. Ostracized and humiliated, Jeffords became an independent, briefly shifting control of the Senate to Democrats. Assessing that sea change, Connecticut's Joe Lieberman joyously proclaimed:
    "This is historic. It gives us the opportunity to set the agenda."

    As it turned out, of course, not so much. With the aid and comfort of 12 Senate Democrats, Bush got his tax cuts. And eight years later, it is Lieberman himself blocking the historic agenda of President Obama and the Democrats at every turn, all without ever getting the Jeffords treatment.

    Why?

    Theories abound. The most common explanation centers on Barack Obama's almost pathological preoccupation with consensus and "changing the tone" in Washington. In his pursuit of a mythical bipartisanship that doesn't exist, President Obama seems convinced it is represented incarnate by McCain supporter Joe Lieberman. Call it the "Unicorn Theory."

    But given Obama's repeated humiliations at Lieberman's hands, that hypothesis doesn't seem to go far enough. After all, Senator Obama backed Lieberman in his 2006 race against Ned Lamont. And despite being savaged by Holy Joe throughout the 2008 campaign against John McCain, the new President Obama insisted Senate Democrats preserve Lieberman's committee seniority and chairmanships. Even Jesus spoke of only turning the other cheek once.

    So what other dynamics at work might explain Joe Lieberman's unprecedented leverage and seeming imperviousness to payback?

    One possibility is the "Sheep Theory." That is, Joe Lieberman must have photographs of young Barack Obama in flagrante delicto with a sheep. And given his Democratic colleagues unwillingness to publicly denounce his treachery, Lieberman's Flickr account must also include some snaps of Harry Reid and others in the caucus going the full Tiger with Santorum's dog, Cornyn's box turtle or another of God's creatures.

    But what explains Joe Lieberman's seemingly unquenchable thirst for sabotaging his former party? Were his nightmares of global terrorism after 9/11 so horrific that he felt duty bound to support virtually any Republican response to it, no matter how ill-advised or dangerous? Perhaps more important, was Lieberman's disgrace at losing his 2006 Democratic primary to Ned Lamont so profound that he would wage jihad against left and center alike?

    Sure.

    Call it schadenfreude. Joe Lieberman is finding pure joy in the suffering not just of the liberal blogosphere and progressive activists, but in the agony of his one-time Democratic friends he believes betrayed him in his hour of need.

    And with the Joementum gone from his own White House hopes and his career in its last throes, Lieberman apparently has nothing to lose. For him, there is no tomorrow, and that makes him an extremely dangerous man. More than willing to down in flames with his former party, Joe Lieberman is now a political kamikaze.

    As I wrote in 2004, it's all a far cry from what happened to Jim Jeffords eight years ago:

    An early indication of the vindictiveness of this administration came with the saga of Vermont Senator Jim Jeffords' defection from the GOP in 2001. This is a tale of double-retribution. First, Jeffords refused to back the Bush tax cut plan in 2001. As The New Republic reported in June 2001, the White House responded by gutting special education programs supported by Jeffords and by threatening the Northeast Interstate Dairy Compact critical to the Vermont milk industry. To add insult to injury, the Bush team took the unprecedented step of not inviting Jeffords to a White House event honoring a teacher from Vermont. They even denied Jeffords' office White House tour passes for his constituents. His departure from the GOP seemed understandable then and now; his one-time colleagues of course are making his tenure as an independent a lonely one.

    Ultimately, Jeffords was shunned by his Republican brethren and was even booted from the "Singing Senators," a group of GOP colleagues which included Strom Thurmond hagiographer Trent Lott (R-MS), future Attorney General John Ashcroft (R-MO) and wide stance enthusiast Larry Craig (R-ID). Humiliated and abandoned by his former friends, Jeffords retired from the Senate in 2007.

    Of course, that won't happen to Joe Lieberman. Barack Obama and the Democrats, apparently, don't believe in the politics of payback. And even if Lieberman doesn't have pictures of them with sheep, Senate Democrats are acting like them.

    UPDATE: The Satirical Political Report looks at Lieberman's latest turnabout to cut off health care reform.

    Perrspective 10:39 AM | Permalink | Comments (3) | Share

    3 Comments

    "Even Jesus spoke of only turning the other cheek once."

    Good rhetoric, but not so much. His comment about turning the other cheek didn't specify any limit. More germane is Matthew 18:21-22 (NIV):

    Then Peter came to Jesus and asked, "Lord, how many times shall I forgive my brother when he sins against me? Up to seven times?"

    Jesus answered, "I tell you, not seven times, but seventy-seven times."

    If Obama is hewing to the Biblical line, I'm afraid he still has a few forgivenesses to go.

    thanks admin.

    very good.

    Post a comment


    Find Entries
    Find by Keyword(s):
    Syndicate:
    Recent Entries

    Sacrilege at Gettysburg
    September 2, 2010
    Comments (2)

    President McCain Speaks on Iraq
    September 1, 2010
    Comments (1)

    Palin Demands Honesty from Obama, Not Bush, on Iraq
    August 31, 2010
    Comments (0)

    The Iraq War: Such a Bargain!
    August 31, 2010
    Comments (0)

    Glenn Beck Playing with Fire on Religious Faith
    August 30, 2010
    Comments (2)

    The Conservatives' Cafeteria-Style Constitution
    August 29, 2010
    Comments (1)

    Everybody Expects the Republican Inquisition
    August 28, 2010
    Comments (1)

    Republicans Resurrect 1993 Talking Points on Taxes
    August 25, 2010
    Comments (1)

    John Boehner's Fuzzy Math and Missing Cojones
    August 24, 2010
    Comments (0)

    The Bush Tax Cuts in Pictures
    August 23, 2010
    Comments (12)

    Monthly Archives
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • Category Archives
  • 9/11
  • Barking Mad
  • Bush Admin.
  • Business
  • China
  • Congress
  • Contests
  • Culture War
  • Democrats
  • Economy
  • Education
  • Election '04
  • Election '06
  • Election '08
  • Energy
  • Environment
  • Foreign Policy
  • GOP Quotes
  • Health Care
  • Image Gallery
  • Immigration
  • Iran
  • Iraq
  • John Kerry
  • Media
  • Nat'l Security
  • North Korea
  • Obama Admin.
  • Republicans
  • Soc. Security
  • Sports
  • Supreme Court
  • Technology
  • Terrorism
  • The States
  • Top 10 Lists
  •  

    Copyright © 2004 - 2010 PERRspectives.com. All Rights Reserved.
    Visit the Contact page to report problems with the site.